AWS vs Azure vs GCP: Cloud Platform Comparison

AreaAWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle Cloud Platform
StrengthsBreadth of services, global regions, mature partner ecosystem.Enterprise integration (Microsoft 365, Entra ID), hybrid via Azure Stack/Arc.Data analytics, AI/ML tooling, global networking, Kubernetes leadership.
Regions (2024)33 regions / 105 AZs60+ regions40+ regions
Enterprise FocusBroad industry solutions, Marketplace ISVs.Strong compliance coverage, SAP, Windows workloads.Data/AI workloads, media, born-in-cloud startups.

Core Services Comparison

CapabilityAWSAzureGCP
ComputeEC2, Lambda, Fargate, ECS/EKSVMs, Functions, AKS, Container AppsCompute Engine, Cloud Run, GKE, Functions
StorageS3, EFS, FSx, GlacierBlob Storage, Files, NetApp FilesCloud Storage, Filestore, Archive
DatabasesRDS, DynamoDB, Aurora, RedshiftSQL Database, Cosmos DB, SynapseCloud SQL, Spanner, Bigtable, BigQuery
AI/MLSageMaker, BedrockAzure AI Studio, ML, OpenAI ServiceVertex AI, Gemini, AutoML
NetworkingVPC, Direct Connect, Transit GatewayVNets, ExpressRoute, Virtual WANVPC (global), Cloud Interconnect, NCC

Selection Guidelines

  1. Existing Investments: Microsoft-centric shops may gain licensing leverage (Azure Hybrid Benefit). AWS offers the broadest independent ecosystem; GCP shines if analytics/AI drive the roadmap.
  2. Hybrid & Edge: Azure Arc and Stack serve regulated edge deployments. AWS Outposts/Wavelength offer similar but with different partner networks. Google Distributed Cloud fits Anthos/Kubernetes-first teams.
  3. Data Gravity: Evaluate native analytics warehouses (Redshift vs. Synapse vs. BigQuery) and data transfer costs.
  4. Talent & Tooling: Consider team skill sets, managed service SLAs, and availability of third-party integrations.

Multi-Cloud Reality

Many enterprises use multi-cloud strategically (best-of-breed analytics, regional regulations, vendor diversification). Standardise on core practices (Terraform, Kubernetes, observability stacks) to limit operational complexity.

References